you know nothing about japan so please shut up

Somebody missed a few geography classes. Isn't it interesting that I actually had no views from Japan that month, and yet you seem to think you live there? Unfortunately for you, there was no fabrication in that article. Go back to school and then try again, in the meantime, "please shut up".

You fat fucken mole, i just thought that i should remind you that you are a depressed puppy and i hope you jump of the sydney opera house to your death! fatty fatty boomba boombaaa, are you still stuck in your house you unsocial pig!

Spoken like someone who clearly has no clue who the fuck I am. Grab a pen and paper, you may need to take notes. Let's begin by ignoring your inability to spell monosyllabic words and move on to the argument-related problems with your e-mail.

Firstly, did you mean "mole"(a small mammal)? From the profanity accompanying that word, I'm assuming you meant "moll" (the girl friend of a gangster)? Unfortunately for you, however, I am neither: I'm not digging tunnels in European woodland, and I'm not dating a criminal.

Not only do I not make a habit out of jumping off tourist attractions, I don't live in Sydney and I do not support suicide, so for me to do as you hope would a bit of a wild card. My advice? Keep dreaming. You've evidently been doing it well since you think you can call me "fatty fatty boomba boombaaa" whilst you don't know me. We have never met, so you're at a blatant loss in terms of being able to support your argument.

Congratulations, you made the same mistake twice. "Antisocial" is the term describing someone/thing who/that is actively opposed to society. From the context, I'm assuming you meant "unsociable"? Add this to the list of your hypotheses to prove. You may need to write it down.

Additionally, I challenge you to prove that I'm a "depressed puppy". I myself have seen nothing to suggest it, so please, feel free to bring in Exhibit A.

Now, if you're done sending random, generic, ill-thought insults via the net to random people you've never met, may I suggest that you find something new to do with your spare time? You're evidently not a flamer. Hell, it appears you never even did debating at school. How does a mushroom farm sound? With all the BS you can conjure up, you could grow some healthy little fungi.

Better luck next time.

dude you need to shout the fuck up im in a band!!! and you can get picz from the web

Let me first point out to the confused readers that this individual was told off by me for stealing copyrighted images and claiming them as his own.

Now, let's go from the top...
Shout the fuck up, eh? That's going to be a little hard in written text... DOES THIS HELP?

And honestly, what do you think telling me you're in a band is going to achieve? Do you think I'm going to be scared of you tracking me down and beating me to death with an amplifier?

The internet is not a "free for all" stock resource. Copyrighted images are still copyrighted on the internet, just as works in a real-world gallery (although you can see them) are not to be taken down from the walls and labelled, "I MADE DIS PICCY, SRSLY, LUV CALEB", scanned and copied, because they're simply not yours. And even if you don't see copyright on the images they are still protected by copyright under the Berne Convention, so don't think that solves your theft problem either. I leave you with this philosophy: "A stereo with no name tag on it is NOT fair game."

i dnt like ur drawings thats other guys are so much better

LOL... What? Other guy/(s)?

"Criticism" involves explaining what you do/don't like about something, not just saying "i dnt like it" - so next time you want to express distate towards my work, be respectful enough as to explain why.

And another thing - "Better"? Do you honestly believe that one artwork can be "better" than another? "Better" doesn't apply to artworks, as art as a whole is a conglomerate of aspects, psyches, philosophies, frames, and misc. pieces that contribute to a work. They cannot be "greater" than each other, nor more "valuable" than each other, as they are all composed of entirely different combinations of the aforementioned aspects. Even "technical skill" is refutable, as that suggests that realism is more physically, materially, mentally, or socially advanced, more time-consuming, and more "difficult" than abstract work, like that of Rothko. And then there is the argument of the role and "value" of conceptual artwork against that of artwork with more emphasis on the material framework, or even "saying something" vs "something pretty". How would one measure that? To put it simply, one cannot. We cannot be weighed, as there is nothing to weigh us by.

And so the moral of the story is: I might prefer the taste of mint to the taste of coriander - that doesn't mean it's a "better" herb!